This requires a lot of constructing new features from the measurements done in an earlier alignment. All reporting uses the last alignment in the program, not the alignment that was active when the measurement was made. ![]() The version that I used only allowed CAD as a visual reference, not for use in programming.Īll reporting must be done in the step where the measurement occurs. If steps are added or deleted before that, then that circle can become identified as “16 Circle” or “10 Circle”.Īs stated by others, no assignments and no using results of previous measurements. If a circle was measured in step 14, then “14 Circle” is its only identifier. That’s where the advantage ends.Īll programming steps are numbered in sequence. MeasureMind can follow any edge contour no matter the shape, where PC-DMIS has to be programmed where to look for the edge. That’s easy to click three points on the edge for a small hole within the field of view, but not so much when the diameter is 200mm. PC-DMIS needs to know the diameter and location first, before it can measure it. It will trace the edge as it sees it, then give you the diameter, roundness and location. For a circle, focus, select the “Measure Circle” icon then double click on the edge. Simple measurements on the OGP were much easier. ![]() I never used Measure-X either, but the screenshot looks similar to MeasureMind. They have a newer software called Zone3, but I don’t know anything about it. My last experience with an OGP CMM was 2 ½ years ago, with software MeasureMind 3D MultiSensor version 14.2.37.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |